Contract of Sales of Goods

Caveat Emptor:

A phrase that means "let the buyer beware" in Neo-Latin. The buyer is responsible for conducting due diligence before making a purchase, according to a concept of contract law that is recognized in many jurisdictions. Although it also applies to other types of goods and some services, the phrase is frequently used in real estate transactions.

the fundamental idea that the customer purchases at their own risk and should therefore inspect and test a product for evident flaws and problems. Even if the purchase is made "as is" or if a fault is evident following reasonable inspection prior to purchase, caveat emptor remains in effect. The vendor is obligated to a higher standard of disclosure than "buyer beware" and has responsibility for problems that could not be identified by casual inspection since implied warranties (assumed quality of goods) and consumer rights have entered the legal landscape (particularly since modern devices cannot be tested before use, and so many products are pre-packaged). It just restates the idea that a buyer must independently inspect, evaluate, and test a thing before making a purchase.

The significance of this provision, however, has diminished due to the current trend in consumer protection laws. The caveat emptor theory, which is Latin for "let the vendor beware," has become more commonplace, even if the buyer is still expected to conduct a reasonable inspection of the products before purchase. Unless the buyer and the seller agree differently, there is a legal presumption that a seller offers certain warranties. The Implied Warranty of Merchantability is one example of such a warranty. For instance, there is an implicit warranty that soap will clean if a consumer purchases it; likewise, if a buyer purchases skis, there is an implied warranty that they are safe to use on the slopes.

Doctrine of Caveat Emptor:

Let the buyer beware is the direct translation of the Latin phrase caveat emptor. The doctrine advises the buyer to exercise sufficient caution while buying items from the supplier. The Ward V. Hobbs case, from 1878, marked the first time the doctrine was established.

Exception to the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor:

• If the buyer specifies the reason for the purchase when making the purchase, the seller must only sell items that are appropriate for that reason; otherwise, the caveat emptor rule does not apply.
• When items are sold by description, every item that is bought from the vendor must match the description. In this situation, the caveat rule will not be used.
• All of the items that are obtained from the buyer when the goods are sold by showing the customer a sample must match the sample. Caveat emptor won't be used in this situation either.
• There is an implied need that the goods must match the description if the goods are described in the contract of sale. The buyer may reject the items if they deviate from the description.
• The items are bought by the buyer for either personal use or market resale. A breach of the requirement of merchantable quality occurs when the goods are discovered to be flawed and cannot be used for either personal use or for market resale.
• If the buyer experiences a loss as a result of a flaw in the goods that is easily detectable by straightforward checking, the buyer is accountable for the loss. However, if the buyer purchased the products relying only on him and the deficiencies in the items cannot be easily found by routine inspection, the buyer may incur damage as a result of the seller's willful concealment of the truth. The vendor will be liable for the loss in this scenario.
• Where the buyer relies on a misrepresentation made by the seller.

Summary of the above points:

• When the buyer purchases things while making clear the reason for the transaction.
• Where products are marketed according to description.
• Where samples of products are sold.
• Where products are sold based on both the description and the sample.
• Where the products are not marketable.
• Where the product problem is difficult to find.
• Where the misrepresentation is made by the vendor.
• Where the seller hides a fact that amounts to fraud.

Transfer of ownership

The transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer is the primary and ultimate goal of the sale of goods. Therefore, when genuine ownership of the items is passed from seller to buyer, the contract of sale of commodities is complete. Any loss or damage will be the seller's responsibility unless ownership is transferred to the buyer. As a result, it is justified that the buyer assumes the risk when ownership passes from the seller to the buyer.

Rules governing ownership transfer:

• Transfer of property of future goods: 
  • Until the goods are determined or absolutely devoted to the contract to bring them to a deliverable state, ownership does not pass to the buyer. Either by the buyer with the seller's consent, or by the seller with the buyer's consent.
  • Instantaneous handover.
  • Delivery of products in a deliverable condition.
  • Transfer of ownership of the products to the buyer immediately after delivery, unless otherwise specified in the contract.
• Goods are to be delivered in specific time, place and carrier (if mentioned):
  • If a specific time, place, and carrier are specified in a contract for the sale of goods, ownership of the commodities is not transferred to the buyer or remains with the seller unless they are delivered at or before the specified time, place, and carrier.
  • In this situation, the parties may want to transfer title immediately upon delivery of the items or upon payment. The contract's terms and subsequent behavior can be used to determine the parties' intentions. The following guidelines can be used if it is impossible to determine the parties' intentions:
  • Delivered State: 
    • When goods are in a deliverable state, ownership of the goods goes to the buyer when the sale is finalized.
  • Put into a Deliverable State: 
    • To "put the things into a deliverable state" implies to give them their final form.
  • Delivery on Buyers Approval: 
    • The property is transferred to the purchaser upon his approval, a sale or return, or other similar conditions. As an illustration, Mr. Shafi delivered an ox to Mr. Bux with the provision that it be sold or returned within a month. Without Mr. Bux's involvement, the ox passed away in just two days. The loss will be borne by Mr. Shafi since the cow was still his property.
  • Goods Do Not Pass Before Ascertain Price: 
    • Until the price is established in accordance with weights and measures, the property does not pass.
• Goods are to be delivered whatever the buyer offer to seller:
  • In order for ownership to shift from the seller to the buyer, the products that should be supplied must exactly match what the buyer offers to the seller. Example Hari agrees to purchase a PC from Ram with a 500GB hard drive. However, ownership is not transferred if Ram provided a PC with a 256GB hard drive rather than a 500GB one. Locations for delivery are:
  • When the product is ready for delivery
  • When the vendor has work to perform
  • When the products must be weighed, measured, and tested
  • Rights of the buyer to examine the products
  • To deliver pertinent documentation to the buyer
• If a buyer offers to do something along with specific goods while delivering:
  • Ownership does not transfer from the seller to the buyer if a buyer offers to do something in conjunction with specific goods when they are being delivered and the seller does not execute that promise with specific products. Example: Ram promises to sell Hari a computer on the understanding that Ram will also deliver a printer. However, ownership does not transfer from the customer to the seller if Ram just supplied the computer and not the printer.
• The buyer must accept goods:
  • The primary responsibilities of the customer are to accept the products and pay the purchase price. The buyer has the option to reject the goods if they are nonconforming. The seller has the right to pursue damages and losses if the buyer improperly rejects products that are in accordance with the terms of the sales contract.

Reference:

• Akrani, G. (2011, 09 2). kalyan-city. Retrieved from http://kalyan-city.blogspot.com/: http://kalyan-city.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-is-cheque-definition-kinds-and.html
• Bragg, S. (2011). accountingtools. Retrieved from www.accountingtools.com: http://www.accountingtools.com/questions-and-answers/what-is-a-bill-of-exchange.html
• Ghai, K. (n.d.). yourarticlelibrary. Retrieved from http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/essay/law-essay/law-meaning-features-sources-and-types-of-law/40363/
• Reuters, T. (2016). findlaw. Retrieved from findlaw.com: http://consumer.findlaw.com/consumer-transactions/what-are-express-and-implied-warranties.html
• Shrestha, R. P. (2007). Business Law. Kathmandu: M.K.Books.
• , W. (2016). businessdictionary. Retrieved from businessdictionary.com: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/implied-condition.html