Subject: Business Statistics
The probable error test can be used to determine the correlation coefficient's significance.
The likelihood of the correlation coefficient mistake is shown by:
P.E.(r) = 0.6745 * \{\frac{1 – r2}{\{sqrt{n}\} }\} = 0.6745 * S.E.(r)
Where, r = the value of correlation coefficient
n = number of pairs of observations
P.E. is used in interpretation whether the calculated value of sample correlation coefficient ® is significant or not.
The lower and upper bounds of the population correlation coefficient that can be anticipated to exist can also be found using the likely error of correlation coefficient.
Limits of correlation coefficient of population = r ± P.E.(r)
Remarks:
Example:
The pair of 10 observations and the correlation coefficient between two variables is 0.81. Discuss the significance of the value of r. Likewise, ascertain the population correlation coefficient's boundaries.
Solution:
We have given,
Pair of observation (n) = 10
The value of correlation coefficient (r) = 0.81
Than, probable error of r,
P.E. (r) = 0.6745 * \{\frac{1 – r2}{\{sqrt{n}\} }\} = 0.6745* \{\frac{1 – (0.81)2}{10}\} = 0.073
Now, 6 * P.E. (r) = 6 * 0.073 = 0.440
Since, r> 6 P.E. (r), we conclude that r is significant.
Again, limits of population correlation coefficient is ,
= r ± P.E. (r) = 0.81 ±0.0733 = (0.81 – 0.0733, 0.81 + 0.0733) = (0.7367, 0.8833)
Lower limit = 0.737
Upper limit = 0.833
Example :
Using the Karl Pearson's approach, determine the Karl Pearson's coefficient of correlation from the following data.
Price of tea (Rs.) |
25 |
28 |
35 |
20 |
22 |
30 |
31 |
22
|
Price of coffee (Rs.) |
35 |
39 |
48 |
29 |
30 |
38 |
40 |
32 |
Also,
Solution:
Let X represent the cost of tea and Y represent the cost of coffee in rupees.
Computation of correlation coefficient
X |
Y |
U = X- 18 |
V= Y - 38 |
U2 |
V2 |
UV |
25 |
35 |
-3 |
-3 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
28 |
39 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
35 |
48 |
7 |
10 |
49 |
100 |
70 |
20 |
29 |
-8 |
-9 |
64 |
81 |
72 |
22 |
30 |
-6 |
-8 |
36 |
64 |
48 |
30 |
38 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
40 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
22 |
32 |
-6 |
-6 |
36 |
36 |
36 |
∑U = -11 |
∑V = -13 |
∑U2= 207 |
∑v2 = 295 |
∑UV = 241 |
Karl Pearson’s correaltioon cofficient is,
r = \{\frac{n∑UV - ∑U * ∑V}{\{sqrt{n∑U2 – (∑U)2}\} . \{sqrt{ n∑V2 – (∑V)2}\} }\}
= \{\frac{8 * 241 – (-11) * (-13)}{ \{sqrt{8 * 207 – (-11)2}\} . \{sqrt{8 * 295 – (-13)2}\} }\}
= \{\frac{1928 - 143}{ \{sqrt{1535}\}. \{sqrt{2191}\} }\}
= 0.9733
P.E. (r) = 0.6745 * \{\frac{1 – r2}{\{sqrt{n}\} }\}
=0.6745* \{\frac{1 – (0.9733)2}{\{sqrt{8}\} }\}
=0.0125
6 * P.E. (r) = 6* 0.0125
= 0.0753
Since, r is much greater than 6 * P.E. (r) , the value of r is highly significant.
r ± 6 * P.E. (r) =0.9733 ± 0.0753
=(0.9733 – 0.0753, 0.9733 + 0.07533)
= (0.8990, 1.048)
=(0.8980,1.0)
References
Chaudary, A.K. (2061).Business statistics. kathmandu:Bhundipuran Prakshan
Dhakal Bashanta (2014).Business Statistics,Buddha academic publisher
Sthapit, Azaya Bikram(2006),Business Statistics,Asmita publication
© 2021 Saralmind. All Rights Reserved.